Wednesday, March 19, 2014

Differentiating my Differentiation.

I have run a small gamut in the world of education so far. It's not overly impressive, but as far as my certification goes, it stretches. I started by teaching 7th grade language arts five years ago, which covered reading, writing, and grammar in one curriculum and it was c-r-a-m-m-e-d but I loved every second of it. Now I'm teaching college prep seniors in a semester-long four-essay base module writing course in which students can earn college credit.  When I saw that this and next week's readings would encompass the thoughts of differentiation as it pertains to assessment, I started to think back to my teacher cert program and how much we learned about this. I thought back to my student teaching experience, where my wonderful cooperating teacher modeled many examples of this, from the simple to the quite complex. I thought about my lovely co-teacher from my years in 7th grade who would do anything for her learning support students in my inclusion class. I thought back to when I taught 8th grade gifted language arts (a class of 12) and how I had to come up with frequent ways to differentiate in order to make it more challenging. And I thought about how now I don't noticeably differentiate. 

But then I read.

And I let myself breathe; I let myself take it all in and I finally felt my footing for this new year of teaching. (If you're doing the math, yes, I have taught something new four of the five years I've been a teacher. I'm assuming many new teachers go through this, yes? Please? Anyone?) 

I felt at ease reading about the definition(s) presented to us by both Wormeli and Moon-- they made sense; I had seen this and done this many times. But seeing some new tactics and thoughts behind these things was comforting. I hadn't, pardon me, crapped out at doing Think-Pair-Shares and the like. The nicest thing I came to understand from Moon's text is that now that I'm more comfortable in my teaching and have relaxed  a little (well, as much as we can relax in this profession...), I'm able to really utilize the data that I create with the assessments that I give, either formative or summative (or pre-). I noticed that I'm just starting to really dig in and change things up for the better. 

I learned from Wormeli that it's okay to question and discuss our methods of differentiation. I really pondered over his theories and thoughts on mastery. I think this is such a hot-button issue in education right now. Well, at least for ELA. Perhaps other content areas have it easier, but in all honesty, how do we judge mastery in English class?! I know we've talked about this in previous discussions, but I liked seeing it alongside the idea of differentiation. Whew---mind blown, I'm totally scattered now. Is mastery different for each student out there? And where do standardized tests fit in? 

Annnnnnnnd now I'm having English teacher anxiety. It's a good time to pause and grade some essays, right?

2 comments:

  1. Lesley, you really helped me work through my prejudices with Wormeli's text. I happened to feel a bit judged by Wormeli. I felt his text was saying that my teaching wasn't good enough, or that my practices were lame, or my understanding of fairness was completely wrong-- however, to read that you heard Wormeli to be saying "that it;s okay to question and discuss our method of differentiation" makes me see the text in a different light. Rather than give us one practice after another after another as a way to remind us how much we HAVENT done, really Wormeli is giving us these ideas as ways we CAN improve if we want to. And of course we want to.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It does take a while to feel comfy in our teacher skin. It always makes me sad when teachers leave after a year or two. I always want to say, "It will get easier!" at least in some ways. I appreciate that you are able to relax a bit now, but not to stop questioning and discussing.

    ReplyDelete